<html><head></head><body>I don't know the answer.</body></html>

Meta has launched a significant crackdown on **unoriginal content** on Facebook, following a similar move by YouTube, in an effort to curb the proliferation of plagiarized, spammy, or duplicated posts while elevating genuine creators and improving user experience[1][2][3][5]. Here’s an in-depth analysis of the current situation and recommended next steps, based on the most recent (last three days) developments.

---

## The Current State: Meta’s Crackdown on Unoriginal Content

### Scale and Urgency

- **Meta has removed around 10 million profiles impersonating large content producers** and acted against over 500,000 accounts involved in spammy or inauthentic behaviors, just in the first half of 2025[1][2][3].
- The crackdown follows YouTube’s own clarifications and monetization restrictions for mass-produced and repetitive material, signaling a **platform-wide movement against content farms** and copy-paste creators[3][4].

### Definition and Identification of ‘Unoriginal Content’

- Meta **defines unoriginal content** as works that **reuse or repurpose another creator's material without permission, credit, or a meaningful addition** (for example, reactive commentary, transformative edits, or unique perspectives)[1][3][5].
- Accounts who simply *repost* viral memes, videos, or text posts face:
  - **Temporary loss of monetization**
  - **Reduced reach and visibility** across their posts
  - Testing of a new Facebook feature where **duplicate videos will link to the original creator**, ensuring proper attribution[2][3].
- **Reaction videos, trend participation, and transformative edits remain permitted**, provided they add value or original commentary[2][5].

### Why the Crackdown?

- Unoriginal content hurts **user experience** and **undermines authentic creators**, diluting the diversity of perspectives on the platform[1][3].
- Accounts that exploit viral material for easy engagement without value addition or appropriate credit have proliferated, impacting Facebook’s credibility and the creator ecosystem[2][5].
- The focus is on protecting **genuine creator growth** and making feeds more relevant for audiences[1].

### Notably:
- **AI-generated content** isn’t explicitly targeted unless it is “low-value” or composed with no unique storytelling or meaningful transformation[1].

---

## Recommendations for Stakeholders

### For Meta and Social Platforms

- **Continue and refine transparency:** Regularly update the public and creators as definitions of originality and attribution evolve with trends in content production[2][3][5].
- **Algorithmic clarity:** Publish clear, easy-to-understand examples distinguishing permissible remixing (reaction videos, memes with unique edits) from spammy copying[1][3][5].
- **Attribution tools:** Expand the duplicate content linking feature to photos and text as well as videos, enabling direct discovery of original creators[2][3].
- **Appeals process:** Establish or enhance robust appeal channels for creators wrongly targeted by automated takedowns, with fast-track resolution for high-impact cases.

### For Creators

- **Focus on transformation:** Moving forward, creators must prioritize original insights, transformative edits, and distinctive commentary when participating in trends or reposting material[1][3][5].
- **Credit diligently:** When using parts of others’ work, always credit the source, even when the content is transformed. Meta will monitor both direct copying and lack of meaningful, explicit attribution[1][2].
- **Monitor for impersonators:** Set up social listening and reporting tools to identify and combat fake profiles or content farms exploiting your work[1][2].

### For Brands and Marketers

- **Shift investments:** Prioritize collaborations with **authentic creators** over viral meme accounts or aggregators whose content may run afoul of Meta’s policy updates.
- **Stay updated:** Regularly review platform guidelines on original content and influencer partnerships to mitigate risk of demonetization or reduced visibility[2][3].

---

## Global and Regional Considerations

While Meta’s latest moves are global in scope, **regions with high levels of creator activity (notably North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific)** are most affected due to the larger volumes of shared content and monetization opportunities[1][2][3]. Emerging market creators should be especially diligent; any reliance on reposted viral content, especially from international sources, now carries greater risk.

- **Local language and cultural adaptation:** Ensure that attribution and transformation reflect local linguistic and cultural contexts, as automated moderation may be less nuanced for non-English content.
- **Regional education campaigns:** Meta should invest in educational resources for regions with less digital literacy regarding copyright and originality to pre-empt unintended violations.

---

## Closing Thoughts

Meta’s crackdown, mirroring YouTube’s earlier effort, signals a decisive industry shift where **algorithms and monetization tools increasingly reward originality, transformation, and transparency**[2][3][5]. The days of easy virality via uncredited reposts are coming to an end. Creators, brands, and platforms must adapt workflows, incentives, and monitoring accordingly or risk exclusion from one of the world’s largest digital audiences.

> “We believe that creators should be celebrated for their unique voices and perspectives, not drowned out by copycats and impersonators.” (Meta Official Blog Statement)[3]

Key facts and figures cited reflect developments since July 13, 2025, based on statements and data released up to July 15, 2025[1][2][3][4][5].

Discover

Philosophy

Learn

Our Thinking.

Meta's War on Unoriginal Content: Navigating the New Standards